State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others v. Safeeq
Case brief
What is this about?
Application U/S 378 Defective No. 154 of 2025; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 10; decided 26.11.2025; judges: Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad. State of U.P. (Prin. Secy., Home) v. Safeeq. Appeal filed on behalf of the victim also — conceded by A.G.A. (G.A.) that it could not have been done — dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh; application for condonation of delay likewise dismissed; certified copies returned to A.G.A., photostats kept on record. Keywords: Section 378, condonation of delay, not pressed, liberty to file afresh, victim.
What did the court decide?
Appeal and application for condonation of delay dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh as prayed; certified copies annexed with the appeal ordered returned to the learned A.G.A. with photostat copies retained on record. ¶10