A maintenance case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. had remained pending for four years before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya without progress. The High Court found the delay justified interference and directed expeditious disposal within nine months of production of a certified copy of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13099
Court No. - 79
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 436 of 2025
Petitioner :- Smt. Pooja Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey,Sandeep Kumar Agrahari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Rakesh
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court, Auraiya should be directed to decide the pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case within a fixed timeframe.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Pooja
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
