Article 227 petition pending since 2012; no appearance by petitioner or counsel. Court invoked maxims on vigilance and finality of litigation and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42714
Court No. - 13
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3547 of 2012
Petitioner :- Chottey Lalla U/A 227 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
Order Date :- 24.7.2025 ML/-
Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chottey Lalla
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Ors.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
