Disposed¶¶9

Indra Bahadur v. Pramila Devi and 2 Others

Allahabad HC7 Apr 2025A227/3258/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition; expeditious disposal direction; temporary injunction application 6-C; Suit No. 1575 of 2022; Indra Bahadur vs. Pramila Devi; Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, Jaunpur; time-bound direction of two months; disposed at admission stage without counter affidavit or notice; no adjudication on merits; neutral citation 2025:AHC:49918; decided 7.4.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, District-Jaunpur to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 1575 of 2022 (Indra Bahadur vs. Pramila Devi and others) in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order. ¶¶9

Indra Bahadur vs Pramila Devi and 2 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶9

Issue for consideration

Whether a direction should issue to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, District-Jaunpur to decide the pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 1575 of 2022 (Indra Bahadur vs. Pramila Devi and others) within a time frame fixed by the High Court.

¶¶6

Court's answer

As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage without calling for a counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondents.

¶¶8

Ratio / Principle

A direction was issued to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, District-Jaunpur to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 1575 of 2022 in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.

¶¶8

Key takeaways

The Court clarified that it had not adjudicated the matter on merits.obiter¶¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.), in a matter under Article 227, disposed of at the admission stage — without calling for a counter affidavit or notice to the private respondents — a petition seeking expeditious decision of a temporary injunction application (6-C) pending in Suit No. 1575 of 2022 (Indra Bahadur vs. Pramila Devi and others). The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, District-Jaunpur was directed to decide the application in accordance with law after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months from production of a certified copy of the order. The Court expressly clarified that it had not adjudicated the matter on merits.

Indra Bahadur v. Pramila Devi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indra Bahadur v. Pramila Devi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Dharmendra and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajbir Singh vs Jyoti Prasad, Deputy Director (Secondary Educaion), Ist Mandal Meerut

Ashok Kumar Mishra and Another vs Smt. Phool Kali and 14 Others

Ashok Kumar and Another vs Ramashankar

Smt. Meera Devi and 2 Others vs Shyamveer