Chinta Ram and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court Article 227 petition disposed of (2025) with interim direction of no coercive action/steps against accused-husband party pending trial in matrimonial dispute; underlying case Crime No. 184 of 2022, P.S. Bhuta, Bareilly under S. 498A and S. 323 IPC and S. 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act (D.P. Act); challenges Criminal Revision No. 168 of 2024 order dated 20.12.2024 of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Bareilly, arising from ACJM Court No. 4 order dated 24.04.2024 in Case No. 716 of 2022; petitioners' undertaking to participate in trial; trial to continue in accordance with law; impugned revisional order not set aside; judge: Nand Prabha Shukla, J.; decided 2.4.2025.
What did the court decide?
Protection from coercive action for the petitioners during the pendency of the trial court proceedings, the trial being permitted to proceed in accordance with law; the petition was disposed of and the impugned revisional order dated 20.12.2024 was not set aside.