Parties compromised, so the petitioner's application seeking dismissal of the Article 227 petition as infructuous was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous following compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:31715
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1968 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ramsaran Singh Respondent :- Santosh Kumar Jindal And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rimjhim Singh,Upendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- R.U. Pandey,Alok Pandey,Avinash Singh Vishen
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order on I.A. No.9 of 2025:
1. The application seeks dismissal of the writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant states that parties have compromised, as such, the petition has rendered infructuous.
3. The application is allowed.
Order on Writ Petition:
4. In view of I.A. No.9 of 2025 being allowed, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.5.2025 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ramsaran Singh
Santosh Kumar Jindal
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
