Petitioner sought a direction to the Gram Nayayalay Chayal, Kaushambi to decide his pending temporary injunction (6-C) application in Suit No. 50 of 2024. The court disposed of the petition at admission stage, directing decision of the injunction application in accordance with law, preferably within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26723
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1928 of 2025
Petitioner :- Aqeel Ahmad Respondent :- Vibha Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Haris Khan,Tripti Yadav
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 25.2.2025 V.S.Singh
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Gram Nayayalay should be directed to decide the pending 6-C temporary injunction application within a fixed timeframe?
Aqeel Ahmad
Vibha
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
