Disposed¶8

Manindra Nath Singh v. Kunwar Siddharth Singh and 4 Others

Allahabad HC2 Jan 2025A227/16084/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Article 227 writ petition; expedited decision of pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No.676 of 2024, Varanasi; disposal at admission stage without counter affidavit or notice; two-month deadline from production of certified copy; merits not adjudicated; Rohit Ranjan Agarwal; Manindra Nath Singh; Kunwar Siddharth Singh; Sakshi Patel.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar Varanasi to decide the 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No.676 of 2024 in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months of production of certified copy of the order. ¶8

Manindra Nath Singh vs Kunwar Siddharth Singh and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court below (Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar Varanasi) should be directed to decide the 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No.676 of 2024.

¶6

Court's answer

The writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents.

¶7

Ratio / Principle

A direction was issued upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar Varanasi to decide the temporary injunction (6-C) application in Original Suit No.676 of 2024.

¶7

Key takeaways

The 6-C application is to be decided in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.ratio¶7
The Court expressly clarified that it has not adjudicated the case on merit.ratio¶9

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 9), bench of Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal (single judge), by order dated 2.1.2025 disposed of, at the admission stage and without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, a writ petition under Article 227 (MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 16084 of 2024) filed by Manindra Nath Singh (counsel: Sakshi Patel) seeking a direction to decide the pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No.676 of 2024 (Kunwar Siddharth Singh vs. Manindra Nath Singh & Ors.), pending since March, 2024. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar Varanasi was directed to decide the application in accordance with law after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months of production of certified copy of the order; the Court expressly stated that it had not adjudicated the case on merit.

Manindra Nath Singh v. Kunwar Siddharth Singh and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manindra Nath Singh v. Kunwar Siddharth Singh and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Haribans vs Shri Ajit Kumar and Another

Rajiv Fill and Drive through Its Partner Samar Garg vs Shri Siya Ram Verma, Taxation Officer, Motor Vehicles Department

Bhikhari Lal vs State of Up and 2 Others

Prem Shankar Srivastava vs Registrar General High Court and Another

Mangu Lal @ Brijesh Kumar vs State of Up and Another

Sushil vs Smt. Gayatri Devi and 4 Others