Applicant sought via a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application to set aside a Family Court order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court upheld the preliminary objection that appeal under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act is the proper remedy, rejected the application, and directed return of the compromise deed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8810 of 2025
Md. Vaseem
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Asad Mahmood, Shujat Kidwai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
A482 No. 8810 of 2025
2
(Brij Raj Singh,J.)
November 20, 2025
Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application is maintainable to set aside a Family Court maintenance decision when an appeal remedy exists under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Md. Vaseem
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
