The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite being listed in revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8542 of 2024
Vijendra Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Home And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar, Chandra Prakash, Muzammil Asad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this writ petition even in the revised call. However, learned AGA appearing for the State is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
November 20, 2025
Haseen U.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vijendra Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Home And Others
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
