Phaujdar Pandey and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application dismissed as not pressed; protest application registered as Complaint Case No.86/2024 by order dated 13.03.2024; summoning order dated 07.11.2024; proceedings before Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bahraich; liberty for regular bail application within twenty days to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, SLP (Cri) No. 5191 of 2021 (order dated 7.10.2021); applicants Phaujdar Pandey, Prag Dutt Pandey, Babloo Pandey & Saurabh Pandey; State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; order dated 8.1.2025; counsel Bhanu Dutt Dwivedi and Monika Dwivedi for applicants; G.A. for opposite party.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed as not pressed; with the direction that if a regular bail application is filed by the applicants within twenty days before the court below, the same be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil.