Allowed¶9
Smt. Kamarjhan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Gram Vikas Lko. and 6 Others
Allahabad HC/7325/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short follow-on order: petitioner was noticee no.1 in a recovery certificate dated 12.06.2025; four co-noticees' identical writ (Writ-A No.8188 of 2025, order dated 01.08.2025) had been allowed, so this writ was likewise allowed on the same terms and reasoning. Respondents include State of U.P., Principal Secretary, Department of Gram Vikas, Lucknow. Counsel: Ravi Kumar Yadav for petitioner; C.S.C. for respondents.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed on the same terms, conditions and reasoning as the judgment dated 01.08.2025 passed in Writ-A No.8188 of 2025 relating to the co-noticees. ¶9