Civil contempt application dismissed as infructuous because the underlying order under Section 67 had been appealed, allowed, and remanded, leaving nothing to adjudicate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2106
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 710 of 2024
Applicant :- Sushila Devi Opposite Party :- Mr. Ajay Kumar Saini Addl. Commissioner Admin. Ayodhya Division Ayodhya And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Prasiddha Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari,Prabhakar Tiwari
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 13.1.2025 DiVYa
Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sushila Devi
Mr. Ajay Kumar Saini Addl. Commissioner Admin. Ayodhya Division Ayodhya
Another
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
