Petitioners sought writ relief concerning a criminal case, but investigation had concluded and charge sheet was filed against them. The petition was dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 559 of 2024
Rudra Prasad Tripathi And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Vinod Kumar Singh, Krishna Kumar Mishra |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A., Nisha Srivastava |
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
November 24, 2025 KU
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rudra Prasad Tripathi And Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
