Dismissed¶12

Smt. Rajlakshmi Singh v. Sushila Singh and Anr.

Allahabad HC9 Dec 2025/55/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajlakshmi Singh v. Sushila Singh & Anr.; Civil Revision No. - 55 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Court No. 6; Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh, J.; decided December 9, 2025; counsel for the petitioner (Kushagra Kanodia) sought permission to withdraw the civil revision petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse as available in law.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse as available in law. ¶12

Smt. Rajlakshmi Singh Vs Sushila Singh and Anr. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CIVIL REVISION No. - 55 of 2025

¶3

Smt. Rajlakshmi Singh

¶4

.....Revisionist(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Sushila Singh And Anr.

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Revisionist(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Kushagra Kanodia :

¶9

Court No. - 6

¶10

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶11

Shri Kushagra Kanodia, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to take recourse as available to him in law.

¶12

In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid .

¶13

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶14

December 9, 2025

¶15

Rakesh/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Rajlakshmi Singh v. Sushila Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rajlakshmi Singh v. Sushila Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S New Akhilesh Traders Thru.Proprietor Suresh Kumar Sahu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Institutional Finance ) Govt. of U.P. and 2 Others

Shri Bhushan Lal Midha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. and 3 Others

M/S Ram Kishore Manish Kumar Thru.Proprietor Sunil Kumar Agrahari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax Registration Sectt. Lko. and 3 Others

Iftikhar Fatima Vs U.P. Waqf Tribunal Lucknow, through its Registrar and 3 Others

M/S S.S. Enterprises Lko. Thru. Its Partner Vimal Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax and Registration U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

M/S Mishra Agencies Thru. Proprietor Meena Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 3 Others