A contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant's counsel nor any adjournment request appeared when the case was called out; any issued notice stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4557 of 2024
Kaushal Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus Sri Radha S. Chauhan Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kaushlendra Yadav, Virendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out.
Present case is listed under the heading of top ten cases.
A notice has been pasted outside the Court room prescribing that the matters listed under the heading of top ten cases and as fresh cases shall not be revised and appropriate orders will be passed in the first round itself.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 14, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kaushal Kumar
Sri Radha S. Chauhan Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko.
Another
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
