Criminal miscellaneous writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner's counsel on revised call.
The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner even on the revised call. ¶¶11
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4381 of 2024
Suresh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
.....Respondent(s)
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
November 19, 2025
Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner's counselmedium confidence¶¶10-¶11
How this case reached the court
List revised; no appearance for petitioner on revised call; learned A.G.A. present¶¶10
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
