Contempt petition filed over compliance with a writ court judgment; counsel conceded the judgment had been complied with and sought dismissal as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2148
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4381 of 2024
Applicant :- Faiyaz Ahmad Opposite Party :- Professor Jamal Akhtar, Director Unani Services, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
As prayed, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 13.1.2025 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Faiyaz Ahmad
Professor Jamal Akhtar, Director Unani Services, Lko.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
