Disposed

Inder Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC4 Nov 2025/3577/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed challenging summoning order and charge-sheet under IPC and SC/ST Act. Court disposed of appeal granting liberty to surrender for bail application with direction to trial court to decide expeditiously per SC/ST guidelines, ensuring no coercive action for four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to surrender within four weeks for bail application; trial court directed to decide expeditiously per Supreme Court guidelines; no coercive measures for four weeks.

Inder Yadav and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3577 of 2025

¶3

Inder Yadav And 3 Others

¶4

.....Appellant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shamsher Ali, Udai Vir Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 27

¶10

HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.

¶12

The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the summoning order dated 15.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Lucknow in Session Case No.2037 of 2023 and Charge-sheet dated 25.02.2023 filed in Case Crime No.0028 of 2023, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 147,323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(VA), SC/ST Act, Police Station-B.B.D., District- Lucknow.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellants shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellants' application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶14

Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellants.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and

¶16

CRLA No. 3577 of 2025

¶17

¶18

if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra) . It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellants.

¶19

November 4, 2025 Satish

¶20

(Manjive Shukla,J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Inder Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inder Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Juvenile Offender S Thru. His Natural Guardian / Father Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Jagdamba Prasad Gupta and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Gopal Agrawal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Agriculture Lko. and 3 Others

Manoj Kumar Mittal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Lko. and 2 Others

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dwivedi vs State of U.P. and Another

Virendra Kumar vs U.P. Gramin Bank (Erstwhile Aryavart Bank ) Lko Thru. Chairman and 3 Others