Contempt application dismissed in default as neither the applicant nor counsel appeared when called in the revised list; any notice issued stands discharged.
None; contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution and notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3386 of 2024
Smt. Chandrawati .....Applicant(s) Versus Sangeeta Singh Sengar Distt. Education Officer, Unnao .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhinav Singh
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
In view of above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
November 20, 2025
Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Chandrawati
Sangeeta Singh Sengar, District Education Officer, Unnao
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
