In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the proceeding for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence, while the state representative was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2726 of 2017
Ram Dutt
.....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) : Counsel for Applicant(s) Angrej Nath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s): Govt. Advocate, Sanjay Kumar Pandey
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Case is called out.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Learned AGA for the State is present.
In view of the above, the instant application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Consigned to records.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court concerned, forthwith.
September 12, 2025
kkv/
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Dutt
State Of U.P.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
