Yogendra Kumar Singh v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC4 Dec 2025/2030/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 2030 of 2025; Brij Raj Singh J.; decided 04-12-2025; applicant Yogendra Kumar Singh granted bail in nine cases unable to give separate bonds and sureties; direction to trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties in all nine cases; relies on Supreme Court order in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky v. State of U.P., SLP(Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018 dated 29.10.2018; AGA did not dispute proposition; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all nine cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the application and release the applicant on bail. ¶¶17

Yogendra Kumar Singh Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2030 of 2025

Yogendra Kumar Singh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 16

¶8

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶10

The present application has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all nine cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in nine cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all nine cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases.

¶12

Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition.

¶13

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all nine cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the application and release the applicant on

¶14

NA528 No. 2030 of 2025

¶15

¶16

bail.

¶17

Application stands disposed of.

¶18

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶19

December 4, 2025

¶20

Mohit Singh/-

¶21

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Yogendra Kumar Singh v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Kumar Singh v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shahnawaz Hussain Siddiqui vs the State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Radheyshyam Yadav and 4 Others vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Ram Asre Maurya and 4 Others vs State of U.P Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Govt. Lko. and Another

Deepak Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Rashid Alias Mohd. Rashid Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another

Amir Kidwai Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another