Disposed

Mohd. Haseeb @ Rockey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC4 Dec 2025/2004/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the execution of a single personal bond and set of sureties valid for multiple criminal cases, applying the precedent in Hani Nishad, to accommodate the accused's financial constraints while ensuring compliance with bail orders.

What did the court decide?

Directed to execute one personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- and produce two sureties each in the like amount valid for all cases.

Mohd. Haseeb @ Rockey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2004 of 2025

¶3

Mohd. Haseeb @ Rockey

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 13

¶9

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶11

The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all four cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all four cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Barabanki are as follows:-

¶13

(i) Case Crime No. 926/2025, Under Section 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station- Kotwali Nagar,

¶14

(ii) Case Crime No. 923/2025, Under Section 303(2), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station Kotwali Nagar,

¶15

(iii) Case Crime No. 883/2025, Under Section 303 (2), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station- Kotwali Nagar,

¶16

(iv) Case Crime No. 919/2025, Under Section 303 (2), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station- Kotwali Nagar,

¶17

NA528 No. 2004 of 2025

¶18

¶19

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.

¶20

Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.

¶21

In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases.

¶22

December 4, 2025 Jyoti/-

¶23

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶24

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd. Haseeb @ Rockey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Haseeb @ Rockey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Umesh Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Indra Pal vs Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, Hazratganj Lucknow

Santosh Kumar Singh vs Smt. Kanchan Verma Commissioner Secy. U.P. Board of Revenue Lko. and Another

Smt. Roshni Kashyap and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Mukhiya @ Munna (Usman Mukhiya in I.D.) and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 5 Others

Sanjay Kumar Jha Vs U.O.I. Thru. Its Secy. Ministry of Finance New Delhi and 3 Others