Allowed

Kasis v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Nov 2025/1302/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, and 504 IPC. The court granted bail, adopting reasoning from a prior order involving a co-accused in similar allegations, subject to standard conditions including bond execution and non-interference with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted till conclusion of trial on furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.

Kasis Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1302 of 2025

Kasis

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farooq Ayoob, Km. Pooja Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 12

¶8

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶10

The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.187 of 2008, under Sections 363, 366, 376, 504 IPC, Police Station Mawai, District Faizabad.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Kismatul Nisha having similar allegations has already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 14.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. 1202 of 2025.

¶12

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer.

¶13

Considering and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶14

In the event of arrest, let the applicant Kasis be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶15

ABAIL No. 1302 of 2025

¶16

¶17

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶18

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶19

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

(d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶21

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)

¶22

November 20, 2025

¶23

J. K. Dinkar

¶24

Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kasis v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kasis v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases