The court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent to press the matter, despite the presence of the learned Additional Government Advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1267 of 2024
| Rahul Kumar Mishra Thru. F Mishra |
Versus ather Shri Devi Prasad |
.....Petitioner(s) |
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Sec Others |
y. Home Lko. And | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Mayank Pandey, Pandey, Ravi Kant : G.A. |
Akhilesha Nand |
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
November 20, 2025 R
Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rahul Kumar Mishra Thru. F Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Sec Others
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
