Disposed¶12

Ram Briksh Ram and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. and 3 Others

Pension – Commutation – Restoration of commuted pension

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2025/11883/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commuted pension restoration period; U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941; Government Order dated 08.12.2008; 15-year vs approx. 11-year restoration; covered by Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P., WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (decided 28.05.2025); writ petition disposed of; Manish Mathur, J.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; October 13, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner(s) declared entitled to the benefit of the judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others), decided 28.05.2025. ¶12

Ram Briksh Ram and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 11883 of 2025

¶3

Ram Briksh Ram And 4 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And 3 Others

¶7

y .	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Shivam Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 7

¶8

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.

¶10

Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in relevant Government Order dated 08.12.2008.

¶11

Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner(s) is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 ( Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others ) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025.

¶12

Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner(s) of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 ( Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others ).

¶13

October 13, 2025

¶14

lakshman

¶15

(Manish Mathur,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Briksh Ram and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Briksh Ram and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Gupta and 11 Ors. Vs State of U.P. Thru Addl.Chief Secy. Home Lucknow and Ors.

Rinku Yadav (S.I. , Civil Police) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 7 Others

Mool Chand Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. (Irrigation Water Resource) Lko. and 2 Other

Nakchhed and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko. and 4 Others

Rakesh Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Umesh Chandra Rastogi vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Finance Lko. and 4 Others