The petitioner failed to appear. The State counsel confirmed that all court-directed payments, including interest and solatium, had been made. Consequently, the Court held that the cause of action had ceased.
Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10194 of 2025
Devi Prasad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Competent Authority Special Land Acquistion Officer Barabanki And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Tripathi, Vatsala Singh
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
December 2, 2025
Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compensation, interest, and solatium directed by the Court have been paid to the petitioner, thereby extinguishing the cause of action?
Devi Prasad
Competent Authority Special Land Acquistion Officer Barabanki
Another
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
