A criminal writ petition was listed for hearing. The petitioners did not appear through counsel. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10039 of 2024
Smt. Bharti And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lovekush Pandey, Sarvesh Baranwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition even in the revised call. However, learned AGA appearing for the State is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
November 20, 2025 Haseen U.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Bharti And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
