Petitioner challenged recovery citation alleging no electricity line within one kilometer. Department showed assessment orders and recovered wire. Court held fact disputes require ordinary remedies. Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:75628-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9668 of 2024
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neera Yadav
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
[Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Order Date :- 18.11.2024 Santosh/-
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether disputed questions of fact regarding alleged electricity theft can be adjudicated in writ proceedings.
Whether a citation of recovery for electricity dues can be challenged in a writ when factual disputes exist.
Shiv Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
