Petitioner's mutation application was pending before the Revenue Inspector without any order under Section 33(2)(a) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court directed the petitioner to avail the remedy of approaching the Tehsildar under Section 33(3) and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71858-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9148 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Savitri Devi Thru Lawful Attorney Durga Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. D.M. Unnao And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 24.10.2024 R.K.P.
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's pending mutation application could be directed to be decided through the statutory remedy under Section 33(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Savitri Devi Thru Lawful Attorney Durga Prasad
State Of U.P. Thru. D.M. Unnao And Ors.
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
