Dismissed

Smt. Munni Alias Shammo v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 4 Others

Allahabad HC7 Aug 2024WRIC/6798/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ to restore possession of disputed property and action against dispossession. Court held the matter is a private civil dispute. Petition dismissed; liberty granted to approach civil court.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach competent civil court against opposite party no. 5.

Smt. Munni Alias Shammo vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:54211-DB

¶2

Court No. - 3

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6798 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Munni Alias Shammo Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abdul Alim Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel who appears on behalf of the State-respondent.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite party no. 5 is dispense with.

¶8

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers:-

¶9

"(I) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding thereby directing the opposite party nos. 2 &3 to restore the possession of the petitioner over house in question situated at Village Samad, Post Mawai, Dhamyana, Police Station Auras, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao, in the interest of justice.

¶10

(II) A Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding thereby directing the opposite party no.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the anti-social elements/bhumafia as well as guilty police personnel who has dispossessed the petitioner from her house in question, in the interest of justice."

¶11

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had got a house for a sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- in Village- Samad, Post Mawai Dhamyana, Police Station Auras, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao which has been taken over by the opposite party no. 5 forcibly as he is bhumafia. The petitioner has made a representation in this regard to the Superintendent of Police, Unnao, but no heed has been paid, hence, this petition has been filed with aforesaid

¶12

prayers.

¶13

We have gone through the representation made by the petitioner to the Superintendent of Police, Unnao, wherein, it has been stated that Nankau son of Maharaj Singh has taken over the petitioner's house forcibly and a prayer has been made to the Superintendent of Police to direct the police to take appropriate action in the matter.

¶14

From perusal of the representation, a copy of which has been filed as annexure 3 to the petition, it appears that it is purely a private dispute in between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 5. This Court sitting in writ jurisdiction cannot direct the District Authorities or even the Police Authorities to look here in such civil dispute.

¶15

This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil court against the opposite party no. 5.

¶16

Order Date :- 7.8.2024 Mayank

¶17

Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Munni Alias Shammo v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Munni Alias Shammo v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Javed Akhtar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Agya Ram Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy Public Works Dept. Lko and 4 Others

Aanchal Singh Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Mumbai Thru. Its Managing Director and Another

Vishnu Prakash Puspjivi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Vidya Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

M/S Gyan Ganga Sweet House Thru.Its Prop. Mr Rama Shanker @ Ramashanker Patel Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Lko and 3 Others