Kalpram Yadav @ Kalapram v. State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Shravasti and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an order under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Respondent argued that a revision under Section 210 of the same Code was the appropriate remedy. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a revision.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.