Israji v. Addl. Commissioner Administration Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya and 4 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30004
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3473 of 2024
Petitioner :- Israji Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Administration Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Ravindra Shukla
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently, due to typographical error, certain facts and documents are left to be mentioned/enclosed along with the present writ petition and prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Order Date :- 16.4.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Israji
- respondent
Addl. Commissioner Administration Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya
- respondent
Other 4
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/3473/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Manish Kumar
- Order 2 · Manish Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court