This court dismissed the writ petition filed by a club member seeking adjudication of a pending representation by the Registrar. The court held no statutory duty existed on the Registrar and no right accrued from past directions.
The writ petition was dismissed without any specific order on the pending representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:158679-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32522 of 2024
Petitioner :- Satyam Gupta Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prakhar Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
Order Date :- 27.9.2024 A Gautam
(Donadi Ramesh,J.) (S.D. Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ jurisdiction can be invoked to compel the Registrar to decide a pending representation filed by a club member.
Satyam Gupta
Union Of India
4 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Donadi Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
