Petitioner sought quashing of a demand notice for impact fees. Court noted pending objection and Apex Court mandate, directing authority to decide the objection within six weeks, then disposed of petition without deciding merits.
Directed the competent authority to decide the pending objection within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:144818-DB
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29487 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ingraham Institute English School Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohit Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vibhanshu Vaibhav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
that even though the petitioner has filed a detailed objection on 30.07.2023 but till date the authority has not finalized the said objection. Merely on the ground of limitation the said writ petition may not be dismissed and a direction may be issued to the respondents to decide the objection filed by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 S.P.
Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of limitation considering the objection file date pending for finalization.
Whether a direction should be issued to the respondents to decide the pending objection within a specified time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority and another Vs. Rajesh Sharma and othersRelied on¶7
Civil Appeal No.5645 of 2015 (Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority and another Vs. Rajesh Sharma and others)
Jyoti Singh v. State of U.P. and anotherReferred¶7
Writ-C No.34123 of 2023 (Jyoti Singh v. State of U.P. and another)
Ingraham Institute English School
State Of Up
Aligarh Development Authority
Respondent 3
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
