The High Court held that it cannot entertain a writ petition concerning a dispute between private parties regarding land possession. The petition was consigned to the record with liberty to approach the appropriate authority.
Petition consigned to record with liberty to approach appropriate court/authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:947-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26341 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Karan
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Revenue And 9 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Khan,Kamlesh Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 4.1.2024
Arti/-
[Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can entertain a writ petition regarding a dispute between private parties interfering in possession of land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Karan
State Of U.P.
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
