The writ petition was dismissed for want of instructions after the petitionist's counsel stated they had not been given fresh instructions for a prolonged period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38121
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 222 of 2016
Petitioner :- C/M Hanuman Prasad Rastogi Girls Inter College Thru Manager Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru Principal Secy Secondary Edu Lko And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Mani Singh Royekwar,Mohit Chandra,Puneet Chandra,Rakesh Chandra Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,M.B. Singh
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Sri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions to press this writ petition since long back.
In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Consigned to records..
Order Date :- 17.5.2024 AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
C/M Hanuman Prasad Rastogi Girls Inter College
State Of U.P
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
