Petitioner challenges an order directing shop removal due to alleged forgery. Court finds prima facie case for hearing, stays operation of impugned order, and issues notice for affidavits.
Operation of order dated 18.01.2024 is stayed pending filing of counter and rejoinder affidavits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2156 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Baran
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, U.P. Govt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bare Lal Bhartiya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 5.3.2024 Arti/-
[Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was afforded an opportunity of hearing before the impugned order directing removal of shops was passed.
Ram Baran
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, U.P. Govt. Lucknow
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
