The Court considered a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy disposal of a pending demarcation case filed in 2020 under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which remained undecided as of 2024.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to hear and decide the pending demarcation case within four months from the date of certified copy of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:122201
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19523 of 2024
Petitioner :- Jagdev Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
" 24 Disputes regarding boundaries. (3) Every proceeding under this section shall, as far as possible, be concluded by the Sub-Divisional Officer within three months from the date of the application."
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 Gaurav
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction for disposal of a pending land demarcation case within a fixed time frame would serve the ends of justice.
Whether the Respondent violated the statutory mandate to decide a demarcation proceeding within three months.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagdev
State of U.P.
Another
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
