The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding construction on leased land within one month, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Direction issued to Respondent No. 3 (SD Magistrate) to decide the pending representation within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:111685
Court No. - 50
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18378 of 2024
Petitioner :- Riyaz Ahmad Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Yadav,Firdos Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
time framed fixed by this Court.
Order Date :- 9.7.2024 AKT
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub-Divisional Magistrate should be directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner expeditiously?
Riyaz Ahmad
State Of Up And 4 Others
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
