Daya Ram v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition listed for further proceedings; counsel sought time to file supplementary affidavit and the court adjourned to 03.09.2024 as fresh. No substantive decision taken.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18069 of 2024
Petitioner :- Daya Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Kumar Shukla,Pankaj Kumar Gupta,S.P. Lal
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri S.P. Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner after making submissions to some extent seeks time to complete his instructions and to file a supplementary affidavit.
As prayed, list on 03.09.2024 as fresh. Order Date :- 13.8.2024 Mini
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Daya Ram
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/18069/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
- Order 2 · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court