Arvind Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court listed the matter as fresh due to the absence of the petitioner and directed the filing of a supplementary affidavit by the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18022 of 2024
Petitioner :- Arvind Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhole Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. None present for the petitioner.
- List as fresh on 24.7.2024.
- Supplementary affidavit be filed by the next date.
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 Jaideep/-
Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arvind Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/18022/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court