Disposed
Bhagwat Pathak v. State of U.P Thru. Distt. Magistrate Distt. Amethi and 5 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/1110/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged delayed action on an embezzlement complaint. The court observed that the Additional Chief Standing Counsel had taken on record an assurance to initiate action within three months and ultimately consigned the petition to the record, deciding no notice to respondents 4-6.
What did the court decide?
No notice issued to respondents 4 to 6; writ petition consigned to record.