Order listing the matter and instructing the Standing Counsel to seek instructions from Respondents 1 and 2. No substantive legal proposition is formulated as the court did not dispose of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11085 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ved Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Commissioner Infrastructure And Industrial Development And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Dwivedi,Rajan Mishra,Shambhunath Mishra,Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
(Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ved Yadav
State Of U.P.
The Commissioner Infrastructure And Industrial Development
2 Others
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
