Mohammad Azam v. State of Up and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition withdrawn by petitioner's counsel, who opted to pursue statutory remedies for his grievances; court disposed of the petition with State counsel's concurrence.
Petition withdrawn by petitioner's counsel, who opted to pursue statutory remedies for his grievances; court disposed of the petition with State counsel's concurrence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112460
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11000 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mohammad Azam Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press this petition and that the petitioner would take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy in regard to his grievances.
Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents has no objection.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Arun K. Singh
[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Azam
State Of Up And 3 Others
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court