Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution when the petitioner failed to appear to press the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1007571 of 2013
Petitioner :- Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer N.E.R. Ashok Marg Lko Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Revenue Govt. Of U.P. And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Pratul Kumar Srivastava,Ajit Kumar Dwivedi,Chandra Shekhar Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Anand Kumar Srivastava,Hans Raj Verma,Rizwan Kamal,Savitra Vardhan Singh
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for the State-respondents.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.1.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
