The writ petition was dismissed for want of instructions as the counsel for the petitioner stated he did not have instructions on the date of hearing.
None. The petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:3193
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1007256 of 2009
Petitioner :- Subedar Khan Respondent :- Smt. Kamla Sharma And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Avadhesh Kumar,V.K.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kr. Srivastava,R.L.Vishwakarma,Sanjay Kr. Srivastava
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Sri Avadhesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that he does not have instructions and prays that the instant petition may be dismissed for want of instructions.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Order Date :- 11.1.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Subedar Khan
Smt. Kamla Sharma And Ors.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
