The petitioner did not appear to press the writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Lucknow Bench dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:32639
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1006567 of 2015
Petitioner :- Anees Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Homes Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendar Saksena,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.4.2024 akhilesh/-
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Anees Ahmad
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Homes Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Anr
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
