Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The single-judge bench dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated the interim order.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:497
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002394 of 2001 Petitioner :- Shyam Lal Govil Respondent :- Suresh Chandra And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- N.K. Seth Counsel for Respondent :- S.C. Shukla,Brijesh Kumar Saxena,K.K. Saxena,S.C.Shukla,Vishwas Saraswat
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the Staterespondents.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.1.2024 Mohit Singh/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shyam Lal Govil
Suresh Chandra
Another
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
