Writ petition filed in 2013 dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite peremptory listing; any interim order stood vacated.
None; petition dismissed and interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:32820
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1001822 of 2013
Petitioner :- Janta Gas Service Napiyar Plaza Thru Sameer Kumar Rai Prop. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Labour Vidhan Bhawan And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sabhapati Shukla,Tanveer A. Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
None present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, which was filed in the year 2013.
On 21.02.2024 the case was adjourned on the illness slip Sri Tanveer A. Siddiqui, the learned counsel for the petitioner and it was ordered to be listed peremptorily.
Today, neither any one is present to assist the court nor any request for adjournment has been received.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 26.4.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Janta Gas Service Napiyar Plaza Thru Sameer Kumar Rai Prop.
State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Labour Vidhan Bhawan
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
